Tilman I think you are little bit confused about get_parent_class() function.
Actually this function return the 'parent class' of the class, object belong to; with which it is called.
In your example one_get_parent_class_name() and two_get_parent_class_name() are similar functions and are located in different classes. Their behaviour will be same if will be called with same object. Just add the following two line at the end. You will get the better understanding.
$two=new two();
$two->two_get_parent_class_name();
extends
他の既存のクラスに似た変数や関数を有するクラスが必要になることがよ くあります。実際、全てのプロジェクトで使用可能な一般的なクラスを定 義し、このクラスを特定のプロジェクトの各々の要求に合わせて調整する というのは、良いやり方です。これを簡単に行うにために、他のクラスを 拡張してクラス作成することが可能です。拡張あるいは派生クラスは、基 底クラスの全ての変数と関数を有します。(これは、実際には誰も亡くなっ ていませんが、'継承'と呼ばれます) この派生クラスには、派生クラスの 定義で追加したものも含まれます。クラスから定義を取り除く、つまり、 既存の関数や変数を未定義とすることはできません。派生クラスは、常に 単一の基底クラスに依存します。つまり、多重継承は、サポートされてい ません。クラスは、キーワード'extends'を用いて拡張されます。
<?php
class Named_Cart extends Cart
{
var $owner;
function set_owner ($name)
{
$this->owner = $name;
}
}
?>
この例は、Cart の全ての変数及び関数に加えて変数$ownerと 関数 set_owner() を保持するクラス Named_Cart を定義しています。 この定義により、名前付きのカゴを通常の手段で作成し、カゴの保有者を 設定したり得たりすることができます。 名前付きのカゴで元のカゴクラスの関数を使うことも可能です。
$ncart = new Named_Cart; // 名前付きの籠を作成
$ncart->set_owner("kris"); // 籠の所有者の名前を設定
print $ncart->owner; // 籠の所有者を出力
$ncart->add_item("10", 1); // (籠から継承された機能)
"親と子"と呼ばれる関係もあります。ある親クラスを作成し、 この親クラスに基づく新しいクラス、つまり、子クラスを extendsにより作成します。 この新しい子クラスを使用することやこの子クラスに基づき他の クラスを作成することが可能です。
注意: クラスは、使用される前に定義されている必要があります! Cartを拡張した クラス Named_Cartを作成したい場合、 まず、Cartを定義する必要があります。 クラスNamed_Cartに基づき Yellow_named_cartという名前の他のクラスを 作成する場合、まずNamed_Cartを定義する 必要があります。要するに、クラスの定義の順序は、重要です。
extends
10-May-2006 02:44
03-Mar-2006 02:54
If you are using a child-class. Remember to call the constructor of the parent class aswell before you start using it. Otherwise you might get different results then you expected. It is stated in this document, but I got confused by the given example. So, here is my example:
<?php
error_reporting(E_ALL);
class test {
var $var;
function test() {
$this->var = 3;
}
}
class testing extends test {
function testing() {
parent::test();
}
function My_test() {
return $this->var;
}
}
$p = new testing();
echo $p->My_test();
// Returns 3
12-Feb-2006 01:37
tilman's note is not quite true. He states the fact that php gives wrong information about the parent class. But this is not the case. Php does give correct information about the parent class, to prove that I give the following code:
<?php
class a
{
function showInfo()
{
print "I am class " . get_class($this) . ", my parent is " .get_parent_class($this);
}
}
class b extends a {}
class c extends b {}
$myInstanceB = new b();
$myInstanceB->showInfo();
print "<br />";
$myInstanceC = new c();
$myInstanceC->showInfo();
/*
output:
I am class b, my parent is a
I am class c, my parent is b
*/
?>
The thing is the function showInfo as they were called by my script, are not a member of class a, but are a member of class b and c. They respond accordingly. Showing correct output in the case of get_class and get_parent_class. So don't go blaming php! =]
19-Jan-2006 11:24
Hi...
as alan hogan pointed out it is possible to inherit a class from multiple other classes but notice that php does not always give you the right name of the parent class if you are deriving from multiple classes (tested on php 4.4.0):
<?php
header("Content-Type: text/plain");
class three {
function three() {
echo("constructor of three\n");
} // end function three
} // end class three
class two extends three {
function two() {
echo("constructor of two\n");
} // end function two
function two_get_parent_class_name() {
echo("i am two and my parent is: ".get_parent_class($this)."\n");
} // end one_function get_parent_class_name()
} // end class two
class one extends two {
function one() {
echo("constructor of one\n");
} // end function one
function one_get_parent_class_name() {
echo("i am one and my parent is: ".get_parent_class($this)."\n");
} // end one_function get_parent_class_name()
} // end class one
$one=new one();
$one->two();
$one->three();
$one->one_get_parent_class_name();
$one->two_get_parent_class_name();
/*
* will print out:
*
* constructor of one
* constructor of two
* constructor of three
* i am one and my parent is: two
* i am two and my parent is: two // should print out "my parent is: three"
*/
?>
So be careful when dealing with parents within classes ...
However, if you are using parent:: it will give you access to BOTH parent classes:
<?php
header("Content-Type: text/plain");
class three {
function three() {
echo("three\n");
}
}
class two extends three {
function two() {
echo("two\n");
}
}
class one extends two {
function one() {
echo("one\n");
parent::two();
parent::three();
}
}
one::one();
/*
* will print out:
* one
* two
* three
*/
?>
26-Nov-2005 05:48
Just a note: It is possible to have a class inherit from multiple other classes, but only in a one-at-a-time linear hierarchy.
So this works, and C gets A and B functions:
<?php
class A {
public function af() { print 'a';}
public function bark() {print ' arf!';}
}
class B extends A {
public function bf() { print 'b';}
}
class C extends B {
public function cf() { print 'c';}
public function bark() {print ' ahem...'; parent::bark();}
}
$c = new C;
$c->af(); $c->bf(); $c->cf();
print "<br />";
$c->bark();
/**results:**/
//abc
//ahem... arf!
?>
This does NOT work:
<?php
class A {
public function af() { print 'a';}
public function bark() {print ' arf!';}
}
class B {
public function bf() { print 'b';}
}
class C extends B, A /*illegal*/ {
public function cf() { print 'c';}
public function bark() {print ' ahem...'; parent::bark();}
}
$c = new C;
$c->af(); $c->bf(); $c->cf();
print "<br />";
$c->bark();
//Parse Error
?>
18-Nov-2005 09:43
Here is a simple idea that I use when I need my abstract classes (the inherited classes) implemented before my functional classes.
<?php
$_CLASSES = array_merge (
glob ("classes/*/*.abstract.php"),
glob ("classes/*/*.class.php")
);
foreach ($_CLASSES AS $_CLASS) {
require ($_CLASS);
}
?>
18-Apr-2005 07:03
[Editor's note: For an alternative to multiple inheritance, see the dynamic binding via object aggregation in the corresponding section of the manual.]
Multiple Inheritance is not supported but it is easy to emulate it
The example listed above does not show the main advantages of multiple inheritance. I mean, that multiple inheritance is used not for different outputs, but to combain properties ant functionality from different classes.
If you will try to create complex structure based on this example, I am sure, will be big problems regarding member variables values and etc.
In example, each time when you use "inherited" class it is temporarily created!
The main advantage of inheritance is direct incapsulation of member variables and functions. And here are no possibility to use this advantage :(
31-Mar-2005 10:11
When declaring a class that relies upon another file ( because it extends the class defined in that file ), you should ALWAYS require_once() that file at the top.
This applies even when planning on looping through and including everything in the folder. Use require_once() in your loop, and at the top of the file that NEEDS the include.
06-Mar-2005 05:19
This may seem obvious, but check this scenario. You have a class folder:
+ class
--classA.php
--classB.php
--classC.php
--mainClass.php
Here... classA, classB, classC all extend the mainClass.
If you try to create a function that automatically includes all of the classes in a folder, normally, they are included alphabetically.
When you try to instantiate classC, for example, you will get an error:
"Cannot inherit from undefined class mainClass"
EVEN IF you instantiate the mainClass before you instantiate all of the other classes.
In other words, make sure your primary class is included before all others.
27-Jan-2005 08:37
I'm not sure if i'm outdated but I think the current PHP version still does not support extension of methods (something that stands between polymorphism and overriding). Hopefully, this could be included in the next release version of PHP!
17-Dec-2004 08:54
Multiple inheritance, if designed properly into the language, most definitely is worth the trouble. Solutions exist for all associated problems (including the name clash issue mentioned above - identify a function by adding the name of the class where is was first defined, and all ambiguities vanish; make the class identification optional if nonambiguous, and it's even backwards-compatible).
The rub is that it's difficult to get a language design that's simple to use, efficiently implementable, and applicable to a dynamically-typed language like PHP.
19-Nov-2004 06:48
Multiple inheritence is often more trouble than it's worth. For example, you have a class foo that inherits from both class bar and class baz. Classes bar and baz both have a fubar() method. When you create a foo object and call its fubar() method, which fubar() method is called: bar's or baz's?
It seems to me that using aggregate to glue one class's methods and data to another object is a bit like Ruby's fixins, but I could be wrong...
[[Editor's note:
The aggregate_* functions have been dropped, as of PHP 5
-S
]]
14-Mar-2004 07:09
I recommend against using the examples here given for multiple inheritance.
The essential problem is having readable code. If you want to be able to read your code in a few months, or if you want others to be able to read your code, you're better off using member variables to store class instances than using hacked on multiple inheritance.
One of the big advantages to multiple inheritance in a language that properly supports it like C++ is that you can see, in the class declaration, what it inherits from. In the example where you extend some class called MultipleInheritance, that only obfuscates your class's ancestry.
So, use inheritance, it's good. But it's not the be all end all of solutions. If it were, we wouldn't have templates and various other things in C++. So don't depend on it. Instead of asking yourself "How do I use inheritance to solve this problem?" you should ask yourself "Is inheritance the right tool to solve this problem?" If the language doesn't support multiple inheritance and you're trying to use it anyway, then you have certainly chosen the wrong tool to solve your problem.
02-Mar-2004 05:35
It is possible to override a method innherited from a parent class by simply re-defining the method (for those of us who enjoy using abstract classes).
<?
class A
{
var $foo;
function A()
{
$this->foo = "asdf";
}
function bar()
{
echo $this->foo." : Running in A";
}
}
class B extends A
{
function bar()
{
echo $this->foo." : Running in B";
}
}
$myClass = new B;
$myClass->bar();
?>
18-Oct-2003 11:50
the model as in the example of "quinton" is what you want to have. Not the method of "kimh216" with function callClass
when calling
function C()
{
//global $a,$b;
$this->a = parent::callClass('A');//no effect
$this->b = parent::callClass('B');//no effect
}
you will not have 1 data object.If i wanted to add a function to class A and i wanted to call it , I can only do it from Class C .. otherwise if I were to do
$c = new C();
$c->someExtraFunctionThatIsInClassA(); it will give an error stating "Fatal error: Call to undefined function: functionName() in f:\ibserver\www\meuk\classvbs\test.php.php on line 34"
------------
If i add a new function in Person class of the first example of quinton:
function boe(){
echo "some text";
}
then i can call it by :
$family->members[0]->boe();
since the members array has Personobjects in it. Now you have 1 Object that can access every function as a whole.
regards rml
04-Jul-2003 08:49
Just a simple example about inheritance:
class a1{
var $a=10;
function a1($a){
$this->a=$a;
}
}
class a2 extends a1{
var $x=11;
function a2($x,$y){
$this->x=$x;
parent::a1($y); // or a1::a1($y) or $this->a1($y)
}
}
class a3 extends a2{
var $q=999;
}
$x=new a3(99,9);
echo $x->a,"<br>",$x->x,"<br> ",$x->q;
The output will be:
9
99
999
22-Jun-2003 08:58
Just a quick note to make things more clear : while multiple inheritance is not allowed, several levels of single inheritance ARE ALLOWED indeed. Just test this example :
<?
class A {
var $name='A';
function disp() {
echo $this->name;
}
}
class B extends A {
var $name='B';
}
class C extends B {
var $name='C';
}
$truc = new C() ;
$truc->disp(); // Will output C
?>
This is especially important to keep in mind while building a huge object hierarchy. for example :
+GenericObject
->+ Person
->->Employee
->+Computer
->->+WorkStation
->->-> PPC
->->-> Intel
->->+Server
->->->LDAPServer
->->->IntranetWebServer
.. and so on. Multiple level hierarchy relationship are possible in a tree-like structure (each child has one and only one parent, except for the root object).
10-Jun-2003 01:07
a nice example using extends and multiple classes and constructors.
<?
class CoreObject {
var $name;
function CoreObject($name){
$this->_constructor($name);
}
function _constructor($name){
$this->name = $name;
}
function show(){
printf("%s::%s\n", $this->get_class(), $this->name);
}
function get_class(){
return get_class($this);
}
}
class Container extends CoreObject{
var $members;
function Container($name){
$this->_constructor($name);
}
function &add(&$ref){
$this->members[] = $ref;
return ($ref);
}
function show(){
parent::show();
foreach($this->members as $item){
$item->show();
}
}
function apply(){
}
}
class Person extends CoreObject{
function Person($name){
$this->_constructor($name);
}
}
class Family extends Container {
var $members;
function Family($name){
$this->_constructor($name);
}
}
echo "<pre>\n";
$family = new Family('my family');
$family->add(new Person('father'));
$family->add(new Person('mother'));
$family->add(new Person('girl'));
$family->add(new Person('boy'));
$family->show();
print_r($family);
?>
26-Feb-2003 06:28
This code fragment does NOT seem to work. It seems as though, the PHP engine when loading a class dosen't set the member vars FIRST, it seems as though it loads the BasicLife member vars before the Super Class methods.
class BasicLife extends Benefit{
//MEMBER VAR simply REFERS TO METHOD OF SUPER CLASS
var $simply = Benefit::get_simply();
//MEMBER VAR me REFERS TO METHOD OF THIS->CLASS
var $me = $this->get_me();
function BasicLife(){//CONSTRUCTOR}
function get_me(){}
}
28-Oct-2002 05:19
I made some change...
If you don't want to call parent::callClass('A') on the every function which have to call it's parent's method.
//multipleInheritance
class multipleInheritance
{
function callClass($class_to_call)
{
return new $class_to_call();
}
}
class A
{
function insideA()
{
echo "I'm inside A!<br />";
}
}
class B
{
function insideB()
{
echo "I'm inside B!<br />";
}
}
class C extends multipleInheritance
{
var $a;
var $b;
function C()
{
//global $a,$b;
$this->a = parent::callClass('A');//no effect
$this->b = parent::callClass('B');//no effect
}
function insideA()
{
// global $a,$b;
$this->a->insideA();
}
function insideB()
{
//global $a,$b;
$this->b->insideB();
}
function insideC()
{
echo("I'm inside C!<BR>");
}
}
$c = new C();
$c->insideA();
$c->insideB();
$c->insideC();
20-Oct-2002 10:13
inheritance from multiple parent classes:
// won't work
class myChildClass extends pClass1, pClass2 {
}
PHP uses aggregation for inheriting from multiple parents, which I think is a bit more complex. See the aggregate function.
(my personal oppinion is that the first method of multiple inheritance should also be imlemented, but I got the answer that it won't be fixed)
27-Sep-2002 01:36
[Editor's note: For an alternative to multiple inheritance, see the dynamic binding via object aggregation in the corresponding section of the manual.]
Multiple Inheritance is not supported but it is easy to emulate it:
class multipleInheritance
{
function callClass($class_to_call)
{
return new $class_to_call();
}
}
class A
{
function insideA()
{
echo "I'm inside A!<br />";
}
}
class B
{
function insideB()
{
echo "I'm inside B!<br />";
}
}
class C extends multipleInheritance
{
function insideC()
{
$a = parent::callClass('A');
$a->insideA();
$b = parent::callClass('B');
$b->insideB();
}
}
$c = new C();
$c->insideC();
---
This will succesfully echo:
I'm inside A!
I'm inside B!
15-Aug-2002 10:37
class a {
function samename(){
echo 'a';
} }
class b extends a{
function samename(){
echo 'b';
}
function b(){
a::samename();
b::samename();
} }
$test_obj = new b();
Quiet confusing though, as this prints out 'ab'.
No need to create a new instance of a,
therefor both methods still exists with same name.
18-Jul-2002 04:42
Just to clarify something about inheritance. The following code :
class a
{ function call()
{ $this->toto();
}
function toto()
{ echo('Toto of A');
}
}
class b extends a
{ function toto()
{ echo('Toto of B');
}
}
$b=new b;
$b->call();
...will correctly display "toto of B" (that is, the function declared in the parent is correctly calling the redefined function in the child)
11-Dec-2001 11:31
if the class B that extends class A does not have a constuctor function (i.e. a function named B), then the constructor function of A will be used instead, you don't need to make a constructor in B just to call the constructor of A.
For example:
class A
{
function A()
{
echo "HEY! I'm A!\n";
}
}
class B extends A
{
}
$b = new B();
produces the output:
HEY! I'm A!
07-Nov-2001 12:08
Just one thing that may seem obvious but not mentionned in this page is that you need to include/require the file containing the parent class or else you'll get an error:
<?php
require(dirname(__FILE__).'/'.'myParent.php');
...
myChild extends myParent {
...
}
...
?>
